The title of this article, of course, does not apply to all men. But a sufficient number of men have turned away from following the traditional path (i.e., first dating, then engagement, then marriage) that the question is a legitimate one, particularly since we hear so often about how the apparent decline of the family has led to many of the ills of the current society.
So what got me to thinking about this subject?
Well, throughout the years my women friends have lodged their concerns/frustrations with me about the men in their lives. They’ve talked about how their man stayed out late, about how he ignored his children, about how he didn’t bring enough money into the house, about how he spent all the money that came into the house, etc. But at least they had a man there to lodge a complaint against. Recently, however, the frustrations have centered around one theme. That’s right; you guessed it: Men seem no longer to be interested in a committed relationship. Oh, the relationships start out promising but always end with the man disappearing after a few dates.
Recently, after receiving such a call from a friend and me being a person who looks at things from the spiritual and/or metaphysical side of life (not just the physical), I started thinking about whether there was something in the spirit of men that was preventing him from settling into a relationship for the long haul. Are men, I asked myself, simply immature or is there a spiritual component to his apparent inability or unwillingness to settle in and settle down, one that does not excuse the man (for those who believe he’d better have an excuse and a damn good one to boot) but one that at least provides a measure of understanding.
For sure, there are men who are immature. But to say that one is immature for not settling down is to assume that settling down is the right thing to do.
The first thing I did was look up the definition of the words “settle down.” I found that these words could be used in many different contexts. However, the themes of the contexts were the same. In all definitions I read, settle down had something to do with becoming fixed, calm, quiet, established, and stationary. Two definitions read as follows:
1. settle for, to be satisfied with: to settle for less.
2. settle into, to become established in: to settle into a new routine.
Dictionary.com
Of the two definitions above, #2 struck a cord. In my mind the part about being established correlated with being “successful” or more importantly, living up to one’s potential. Being that the purpose of my writings is to inspire people to be creative, to, in essence, live of up to their potential, it struck me that if settling down meant being established then a person who is not established/not living his or her potential cannot be settled (spiritually speaking) and thus will have trouble settling, in the physical sense.
Most societies do not support individualism. Most societies are about following the status quo. When one follows the status quo one essentially stifles their own creativity. The problem that exists today is that while part of our society still promotes the old belief of adhering to the status quo, there is a growing band of individuals that have entered a new dimension of consciousness. Self-realization is a major component of this new consciousness. Self-realization does not lend itself to settling for less as stated in definition #1 nor does it lend itself to settle into a routine as stated in definition #2. It does however lend itself to the concept of being established or better said, it does lend itself to being one who is grounded, self-assured, being creative, being authentic, living your purpose. So that today, it is becoming ever more difficult for anyone (man or woman) to participate (especially long term) in any endeavor which feels as though it may threaten their right to live as a free being, to live their purpose.
Sadly, too many men (women too, but this article is about men) are not living the lives they want to live. They are working jobs that do not bring satisfaction and are working for bosses who show them little respect. They have not been taught how to be business owners (which many of them yearn to be) and so they feel trapped. The older they are, the more they feel time slipping away. These men often go through what is known as the mid-life crisis which will be for many their only chance to really express themselves. As for the younger men, many of them are rebelling right out of the gate, refusing to travel the same path that caused their fathers, brothers and uncles so much internal grief, and this rebellion spills over into their relationships, sadly after many of them have already conceived children, too many of which will feel the backlash of their fathers’ frustration.
This inability or unwillingness to fulfill one’s potential should not be used as an excuse to shirk one’s responsibilities, particularly when it comes to taking care of one’s children. Still, many men cannot bear the limitations associated with being responsible for someone else when they have not yet been responsible to themselves, spiritually speaking. Not to be responsible to self, not to take care of self, not to attain to one’s dreams is very unsettling to one’s soul. And, if you are not settled within, you cannot be truly settled without. In my opinion a man should do three things before he takes on external, life altering responsibilities: (1) he should find out who he is, at his core (2) he should find out his purpose and live it, and (3) he should build a profitable business.
As I have said, man has entered a new dimension of consciousness. It is a dimension that is evolving from the inside out- meaning that in spite of our lack of awareness or our wanting to do the opposite, as a species, we can no longer settle for being less than we are capable. The decline in marriage is not a fluke; neither is the increase in divorce. These phenomenons are linked to the increasing need for self-actualization. Neither women nor men can no longer put up with a partner who criticizes rather than encourages. All over the planet people are breaking the bonds of repression and are refusing to enter into any relationship that has even a hint of repressiveness. Sure, in our pursuit of freedom we are doing many things wrong. Sure, there is chaos but chaos is always the precursor to change and this…is a collective change. We have all had a hand in bringing about this new man.
Some 50 years ago women got fed up with being oppressed by men so they sought and succeeded in changing the landscape of the male and female relationship. For good or bad, today’s man is one byproduct of that change. You cannot claim freedom for women without creating a corresponding energy of freedom for men. The universe demands balance.
As with all change the time will come when things will return to an even keel. We will once again learn how to relate to each other; but instead of relating in a way that makes us feel confined our new motto will be freedom for you and freedom for me. Freedom is love and love is freedom and the outgrowth of freedom is self-expression without condemnation and that is worth settling for.
